Jira Kanban vs Scrum. This summarizes a three-decades-old battle of Agile methods since Jeff Sutherland first practiced Scrum in 1993.
Since then Jira has been a valuable tool for the project, product, and task management. Also, teams can connect real-time test cases and get reliable quality assurance, especially with the Jira testing tool.
Jira Software was built by Atlassian, an Australian company to aid various groups in identifying as “Agile” and implementing Scrum and Kanban methods seamlessly.
Interestingly, even though these two standard systems are widely employed in building products and managing groups, there is still the recurring question; “Is Kanban better than Scrum”?
Plus, most people don’t appreciate their uniqueness and dissimilarities or know which one to adopt. So, we will explain these Agile methods, their differences, and how to decide on the ideal choice for usage in subsequent projects.
What are the Kanban Boards?
Kanban boards are designed to allow a group to develop panels for assigned projects.
The board displays an easy-to-understand view of work progress, keeps members up to speed, and permits users to begin tasks without a comprehensive structure.
With Kanban, groups cannot arrange jobs in smaller cycles. But on the flip side, it will aid users in viewing and attending to every challenge in one go. That way, there is transparency, plus group participants do not need to keep tabs on themselves, as all the information will be easily accessible.
What are the Scrum Boards?
Scrum boards are designed employing the Scrum structure to emphasize steady process advancement by sharing complex jobs into several bite-size portions. It is recommended for groups that brainstorm and map out their complete idea thoroughly before beginning a task or building a product.
This process involves sharing the task into smaller cycles and allocating story points to user stories. Individual groups with their scrum masters agree on sub-tasks to move to these cycles or leave in the backlog.
Users can also develop new cycles as the work progresses by taking out tasks in the backlog to a cycle. Additionally, you can incorporate the Jira Scrum board in the Plan or Active Sprint mode, especially with aqua’s Jira testing tool.
Now, here’s where they differ:
For the Plan mode, a group may rearrange subtasks from the backlog to a productivity cycle and allocate a period for completion. But with the Active Sprint mode, they move cards among the panels and Complete Sprints.
Top 5 Differences Between Kanban and Scrum Boards
Since we now understand the Scrum and Kanban boards, let’s see the differences.
1. Planning
With Jira Scrum, every ticket you create first goes straight to the backlog. After brainstorming and closer observation, the group assigned to the task determines what features should go into the sprints (cycles).
But with Kanban, every part of the task inevitably remains in the backlog column, as there are no options for sharing in cycles.
2. Board Display
For a user who wants to thoroughly monitor a task from cycles, reports, and story points, Scrum boards are your go-to Agile method. But, if you want to spot issues easily, Kanban is ideal.
3. Setup and Maintenance
The Kanban panel will be perfect for beginning a task quickly. Since these tasks are not dependent on allocated completion times, maintenance is more straightforward.
But, even though you may configure Scrum panels faster with the upgraded Jira features, it will be more prudent to employ the Scrum board when there is enough time to plan a complete task. Plus, managing a Scrum board is often complex because of the extra steps to deploy any changes.
4. Functions
While Scrum panels have various reporting functions, like the burndown chart to monitor the general sprint development and scope, the velocity chart, epic, and version report, the control chart is the most common report on Kanban panels.
It measures the stipulated, and the exact time it takes a team to attend to tasks so that supervisors can strategize on how to optimize their groups.
5. Workflow
The reports decide the cards users see to understand the flow of work in Scrum boards. So, altering the cards would require modifying the flow of work.
But with the Jira Kanban board, changing work steps is not as stressful. The user will only need to map the columns to varying statuses in your task process. That way, when you make alterations to your work journey, you can revise the dashboard by including or excluding columns.
Final Thoughts:
After the comparison, we can agree that the Kanban and Scrum Agile approaches have individual strengths, so deciding the model to deploy may prove challenging.
But to build and encourage visibility, continuous improvement, and efficiency, use the Kanban board. Additionally, since you can easily incorporate Jira Kanban into existing processes, it’s perfect for users that don’t want to rebuild an entire work process to enjoy the perks of being Agile.
Scrum is perfect for increasing efficiency, delivery, quality, and cost-effectiveness. It is also recommended for handling intricate tasks in a fast-paced industry or where you must adapt to feedback and updates.
But note that no process is set in stone.
The aim is to meet goals, and if you may have to create a hybrid to get things done effectively, you can try a “ScrumBan”.
If you still have doubts or queries you need answers to, contact Agile experts to work with you in setting up a system and increase your team’s efficiency today!
COMMENTS